PMID- 36511761 OWN - Quintessence Publishing Company, Ltd. CI - Copyright Quintessence Publishing Company, Ltd. OCI - Copyright Quintessence Publishing Company, Ltd. TA - Oral Health Prev Dent JT - Oral Health and Preventive Dentistry IS - 1757-9996 (Electronic) IP - 1 VI - 20 PST - epublish DP - 2022 PG - 533-540 LA - en TI - Parents’ and Children’s Acceptance of Silver Diamine Fluoride Application on Primary Teeth in the United Arab Emirates LID - 10.3290/j.ohpd.b3680331 [doi] FAU - Walia, Tarun AU - Walia T FAU - Shetty, Raghavendra M. AU - Shetty R FAU - Al-Sammarraie, Lara M. AU - Al-Sammarraie L CN - OT - children OT - parent preferences OT - primary teeth OT - silver diamine fluoride OT - United Arab Emirates AB - Purpose: To assess the acceptance of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) application on children’s teeth among parents and children in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Materials and Methods: A pre-tested questionnaire and clinical photographs of SDF-treated teeth were employed to determine preferences among 370 parents for its use in managing dental caries in their children’s teeth. A similar number of children ages 4 to 8 years were also interviewed, and their reaction to SDF was assessed through a facial image scale after showing pictures of pre- and post-SDF treated primary teeth. Results: 265 mothers and 105 fathers participated in this study. The Χ2 test was used to test for the statistically significant differences between parental perceptions. Almost all parents responded that SDF was either unacceptable or extremely unacceptable for their children’s anterior teeth in comparison to 63% for posterior teeth (p = 0.009). Fathers were more comfortable with SDF treatment for posterior teeth on a scale of 3.1 out of 4, in comparison to 1.8 for mothers (p = 0.007). Parents with limited education (up to primary school) showed greater SDF acceptance in comparison to college-graduate parents (p = 0.000). The level of parental SDF acceptance increased with the children’s behavioural barriers. The older children had a lower acceptance rate, at 1.2 and 2.5 for anterior and posterior teeth, respectively (p = 0.000). Conclusions: SDF was acceptable to UAE-based parents for posterior teeth; however, they preferred it for anterior teeth only when advanced behavioural management (e.g., sedation) was advocated. Socioeconomic factors moderated their SDF preference regarding the location of tooth and treatment difficulty. Younger children were relatively more receptive to SDF use than were older children. AID - 3680331