Books

Purpose: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is a safe and predictable technique used to increase bone volume under sinus cavity for implant placement in atrophic posterior maxilla before implant placement. Despite conflicting results concerning the new bone formation rates with or without a barrier membrane, the benefits of using a collagen membrane to cover the lateral bone window has been demonstrated, in order to prevent bone substitute particles dislodgement that may occur from the sinus cavity through the sinus antrostomy towards the oral mucosa, and to significantly reduce the postoperative swelling and pain reactions. The purpose of this case series is to present a sling suture technique used to stabilize the collagen membrane against the lateral bone window so as to improve the bone substitute stability inside the sinus cavity. Materials and Methods: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach using sling suture technique to maintain the collagen membrane against the lateral bone window was performed in 17 patients (8 women/ 9 men, mean age: 58.2 years). Postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images up to 6-month follow-up were performed to control the bone graft stability at the level of the lateral antrostomy. The clinical postoperative pain and swelling were assessed through a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire from level 1 (low), level 5 (acceptable), to level 10 (high) at one week postoperative. Results: No bone substitute displacement was observed for all clinical cases on the CBCT images at 6-month postoperative. The pain and swelling level observed at one-week post operative were significantly low (respectively 1.6±1.0/2.1± 0.9). Conclusions: Within the limits of this case series, the use of sling suture technique to maintain the barrier membrane at the level of the lateral bone window in case of maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach surgery revealed to be a predictable protocol to prevent bone substitute displacement outside the sinus cavity.

Objectives: The aim of this narrative review is to describe the emerging evidence concerning etiological factors and pathophysiological mechanisms involved in peri-implant inflammatory diseases. Material and Methods: An electronic search for articles published until November 2022 was conducted in MEDLINE by three independent reviewers to identify manuscripts reporting data on etiological factors and pathophysiological mechanisms associated with peri-implant diseases. Results: Current evidence suggests that peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are inflammatory conditions linked to a microbial challenge. However, in recent years, there has been increasing evidence indicating that certain peri-implant inflammatory conditions may not be primarily related to biofilm-mediated infectious processes but rather to other biological mechanisms, such as a foreign body response. Conclusion: The current evidence, not only in the dental literature, opens new avenues for a more complex interpretation of the etiopathogenetic factors involved in peri-implant diseases. A better understanding of various factors related to the host response, including dysbiosis mechanisms associated with changes in microbiota composition, is necessary for a more precise physiopathological characterization of these diseases. Keywords: Keywords: dental implant; peri-implant diseases; foreign body response; microbial biofilm; periimplant Infection.

Fifty-seven interproximal restorations invading the supracrestal tissue attachment were evaluated over a mean period of 15 years (10-23 years) in terms of crestal bone loss. The distance from the cavity margin to the bone was measured at T0 and controlled using X-rays and a measurable landmark. The mean bone loss in the vertical dimension was 0.46 mm, with a 96.49% survival rate. Smoking habits (p = 0.02) and tooth type (p = 0.03) significantly affected the bone loss. The proposed technique could help the clinician in adopting a minimally invasive approach in the treatment of heavily compromised teeth. Future research with rigorous study designs would be interesting to guide the clinical decision making.

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of a shortened protocol (using a lateral approach) for early surgical reentry, following a large sinus membrane perforation that occurred during maxillary sinus augmentation (lateral approach), for the rehabilitation of patients with an atrophic posterior maxilla. Between May 2015 and October 2020, seven patients underwent reentry surgery using a lateral approach protocol 1 month after a large sinus membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation with lateral approach surgery. All patients presented a residual under-sinus bone height < 3 mm in the posterior maxilla. The sinus membrane was elevated during the reentry surgery, without any difficulty for any patient, using manual blunt elevators or piezoelectric devices, and the sinus floor height was augmented with bone substitute particles. No further perforations were made, and no complications were recorded during the follow-up period from 18 months to 6 years. The 1-month waiting period after the initial sinus surgery allows easy sinus membrane elevation and a lack of complications. This timing could be a feasible option for surgical reentry after a large sinus membrane perforation occurs.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of fixed complete dental prostheses supported by axial and tilted implants after at least 3 years of follow-up. Materials and Methods: An electronic search plus a hand search up to April 2021 was undertaken. Clinical studies were selected using specific inclusion criteria, independent of the study design. The main outcomes were cumulative implant survival rate, marginal bone level changes, and complications, after ≥ 3 years of follow-up. The difference in outcomes between axial and tilted implants and between the maxilla and mandible was evaluated using meta-analysis and the Mantel-Cox test. Results: Out of 824 articles retrieved, 24 were included. In total, 2,637 patients were rehabilitated with 2,735 full prostheses (1,464 maxillary, 1,271 mandibular), supported by 5,594 and 5,611 tilted and axial implants, respectively. In a range between 3 and 18 years of follow-up, 274 implants failed. The cumulative implant survival rate was 93.91% and 99.31% for implants and prostheses, respectively. The mean marginal bone level change was moderate, exceeding 2 mm in only two studies. Marginal bone loss was significantly lower around axial compared with tilted implants (P < .0001), whereas it was not affected by arch (maxilla vs mandible; P = .17). Conclusion: Fixed complete dental prostheses supported by tilted and axially placed implants represent a predictable option for the rehabilitation of edentulous arches. Further randomized trials are needed to determine the efficacy of this surgical approach and the remodeling pattern of marginal bone in the long term. Keywords: axial implants, immediate loading, mandible, marginal bone loss, maxilla, tilted implants

Common challenges encountered for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation are the inadequate width and height of attached keratinized mucosa (AKM) and shallow vestibular depth. This study presents a buccally displaced palatal (BDP) flap technique to increase the tissue thickness and AKM width at the second-stage surgery and reestablish the correct fornix depth. The peri-implant pocket depths, modified Plaque Index score, modified sulcus Bleeding Index score, and soft tissue recession were evaluated 6 and 12 months after prostheses loading. A total of 52 implants were placed and analyzed, and no implant failures were found. No significant changes in peri-implant parameters were observed between 6 and 12 months, and mean recession was less than 0.2 mm after 12 months. Though this change was statistically significant, it was clinically irrelevant. The results demonstrate that adequately healthy peri-implant soft tissues and substantial dimensional stability of vestibular soft tissues at the 1-year follow-up were achieved with the BDP flap technique. The BDP flap could represent a viable option for increasing the width and the height of AKM and establishing the correct maxillary fornix depth.

Maxillary sinus wall fenestration at the lateral wall or floor of the sinus can result from many potential factors, such as the repair of oro-antral communication, Caldwell-Luc antrostomy, tooth extraction after an endodontic or periodontal infection that eroded the sinus wall, and the combination of sinus pneumatization and alveolar ridge resorption after teeth removal. When sinus wall fenestration is observed on radiographs, it usually indicates adhesion between the sinus membrane and buccal flap, which makes the reentry surgery for subsequent sinus augmentation challenging. To minimize surgical complications in these challenging scenarios, this paper presents a split-flap surgical technique for the management of soft tissue adhesion between the sinus membrane and alveolar mucosa when attempting a lateral window sinus augmentation.

The aim of the present study was to generate an international and multidisciplinary consensus on the clinical management of implant protrusion into the maxillary sinuses and nasal fossae. A total of 31 experts participated, 23 of whom were experts in implantology (periodontologists, maxillofacial surgeons and implantologists), 6 were otolaryngologists and 2 were radiologists. All the participants were informed of the current scientific knowledge on the topic based on a systematic search of the literature. A list of statements was created and divided into three surveys: one for all participants, one for implant providers and radiologists and one for otolaryngologists and radiologists. A consensus was reached on 15 out of 17 statements. According to the participants, osseointegrated implants protruding radiographically into the maxillary sinus or nasal fossae require as much monitoring and maintenance as implants fully covered by bone. In the event of symptoms of sinusitis, collaboration between implant providers and otolaryngologists is required. Implant removal should be considered only after pharmacological and surgical management of sinusitis have failed. Keywords: consensus, dental implants, maxillary sinus, nasal fossae Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.

Aims: Zygomatic implants are successful alternatives to conventional dental implants for oral rehabilitation of patients with severely atrophic maxillae; however, the use of unilateral zygomatic implants needs to be studied further to validate their efficacy. The present investigation aimed to evaluate unilateral zygomatic implant placement in the oral rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients with extremely atrophic maxillary bone and/or previous implant failures. Materials and methods: This retrospective clinical study included patients with partially edentulous maxillae who underwent unilateral zygomatic implant insertion. The primary outcome was implant survival. Intraoperative, postoperative and prosthetic complications were also assessed based on patients’ clinical records. Results: A total of 32 patients (34 zygomatic implants) with a mean age of 60.45 ± 8.74 years (range 47 to 78 years) were included in the study. The mean follow-up period was 34.3 ± 25.5 months, and the overall implant survival rate was 100%. No intraoperative or postoperative complications developed in any of the patients, and no prosthesis failures or complications were recorded. Conclusions: The results indicate that unilateral zygomatic implant insertion for oral rehabilitation of patients with partially edentulous posterior maxillae with severely atrophic bone and/or previous implant failures can be considered a successful alternative to use of conventional dental implants associated with advanced bone grafting procedures. Keywords: maxillary rehabilitation, oral rehabilitation, partially edentulous atrophic maxilla, unilateral zygomatic implants, zygomatic implants Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: To assess whether bone grafting is associated with early implant failure (defined as a lack of osseointegration detected prior to functional loading) and to evaluate the association between bone grafting procedures and other risk factors for early implant failure. Materials and methods: Two independent reviewers conducted an electronic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed). Meta-analysis was performed for the odds ratio of bone grafting procedures associated with early implant failure. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort studies was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: Of the 231 articles selected for full-text review, 10 were included in the qualitative analysis and for quantitative meta-analysis. An odds ratio of 1.50 (95% confidence interval 1.06–2.13) was recorded for bone grafting procedures associated with early implant failure. Data regarding the association of bone grafting and other risk factors in determining early implant failure were insufficient for quantitative analysis. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, a significant positive association was found between bone grafting procedures and early implant failure. The possible negative effect of bone grafting procedures on implant osseointegration should be considered when planning implant therapy. Keywords: alveolar bone grafting, dental implants, early implant failure, meta-analysis, systematic review Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest relating to this study.